A Literature Review Identifying Group of Learners Within Society and Providing Reasons for Their Possible Underachievement Essay

Those could hold students who do not perform healthful up in a specific subject atomic number 18a, do not show pursual in gaining qualifications or by chance atomic number 18 limited by distressing langu board skills or assimilation from doing well pedantic entirelyy at instill. at that place withstand been some explanations for low attainment and some of them include * lifelike differences surrounded by sexes, * Natural intelligence, * Home background, * Type of naturalizeing, * Different teaching styles (stereotyping by teachers), * Material factors (Hammersley-Fletcher, Lowe &amp Pugh, 2006).Halsey performed a survey of the scoreing single out and found that material factors were centimeral to whether learners stayed at compute beyond the age of 16 (Halsley cited in Hammersley-Fletcher, Lowe &amp Pugh, 2006). government agency for Education in like manner states that the gap surrounded by the outflank and score performers in our system truly widen s as they go through preparation and it is both significantly wider and much closely related to socio-economic status in this country than anywhere else (DFES, 2004).In fosterage, the relationship between initiates and social inequality is often explored by feel at the test and examination scores achieved by different groups of children and youngish people, and some other monitoring data. According to Molly Warrington by the age of 11, girls in many primary inculcates are performing cave in than boys, particularly in English, and this pattern of differential exploit is sustained and exacerbated throughout alternate education (Warrington and two-year-older, 2006).This is a particular concern for discolor executeings manikin boys which is the designer wherefore we should evaluate it further trying to establish possible reasons for their under exertion. BBC describe that government figures from January 2008 show only 15% of discolour on the job(p) row boys in Engl and getting five good GCSEs including maths and English. (BBC News, 2008). Above popular opinion is also place uprighted by the chief inspector of shoals who stated that white boys from poor families were worst affected and achieved the worst results aged 16 at school. light British boys who qualify for free school meals achieve the worst results of any apart from gypsy and traveller children with just 29 per cent getting good marks. (Daily Mail, 2012) why is this happening then in a modern world where we seem to have unlimited access to books, resources and other forms of help towards achievement? There is no doubt that to be fit to achieve we must have the desire to learn and aspirations to perform well academic aloney.Maslows Hierarchy of Needs outlines the necessity of satisfying the basic physiologic and safety needs before the ones on upper levels like achievement, appreciation and approval make students realise their potential. Unfortunately white working categorise households often undermine the nurse of schooling, academic achievement and aspirations. Boys from in truth premature age associate manual labour with masculinity and toughness therefrom do not find academic learning relevant to them as it is not ground on what they have been told or taught at home.Department for Education confirms that schools where socio-cultural strategies were about transformative were those where head teachers recognised that there were sometimes conflicts between the cultural contexts of home and school, and that much(prenominal) conflicts might lead to dis makement and potential underachievement (DfES, 2005) Paul Willis performed a case study through a luxuriant ethnographic account of school lives of white working class boys who were destine for labour.Boys showed lack of commitment to schoolwork and an acceptance of the countenance of the teacher at the same time associating manual labour with masculinity and toughness. Willis argued that the boys were sketch upon cultural reflections of masculinity which idealised manual workers strength, so becoming a source of high self-esteem. The lads asserted their masculinity in the stories they told some resisting intellectual work (Willis, 1977). Most schools in Britain are dominated by the anti-education and anti-aspiration culture which has much more pronounced effects on boys.They believe that it is not cool to learn, that real men work with their hands, not their minds, and that school does not matter (Telegraph, 2011). All of the above are deeply ingrained in our culture therefore boys like acting tough or laboured, for example, by fighting or earthly denying adult authority using learning ability and wit, sometimes as a confrontational device against teachers wearing modernistic clothes and trainers or possessing culturally acclaimed knowledge, for example, being able to talk knowledgeably most the latest computer game (Swain, 2003, 2004).There are many reasons for t his demeanor but Connell claims that working class communities in some parts of England are those most affected by the collapse of the traditional local manufacturing pains base and deindustrialization. These working-class boys can no longer rely on work for their traditional status of power and see little focalise in gaining qualifications, therefore are more likely to reject values that are conducive to academic success such as work ethic or punctuality.For the same reason they do not value academic success and admire peers challenging schools authority (Connell cited in Younger, 2005). How do we change that? What do schools need to provide the best possible progress and the highest attainment for all pupils? Practical suggestions for educational organisations to cleanse meet the needs of these pupils. Given the amount of literature talking about the underachievement of working class white boys, it appears that the representing material available, suggesting solution to the ontogeny problem is limited.The suggestions on how to better meet the needs of these boys have been based on the literature re good deal. Main points however, have been developed through discussions with school staff, parents and pupils from a local primary school where most pupils are White British with a few from minority ethnic groups. The proportion of pupils with particular(a) educational needs and/or disabilities and with a statement of special educational needs is below that found in most schools. Those discussions gave an insight into happy practices that minimise the impact of barriers to achievement for white working class boys. later on careful consideration of the subject, improving achievement of boys appears to be a very complex process linked to many factors playing important parts. They include factors like leadership and vision, the curriculum and voice communication support, behaviour management, parental engagement, targeted support including the role of the le arning mentor in supporting white working class pupils. Successful transition to Year 7 from Year 6 has proven to also have a positive impact on white working class pupils. These factors are significant in all schools, whether mixed or single-sex, hold ined or independent.Senior managers play a crucial role in determining the most appropriate strategy for school improvement, based on close examination of the school mooring and identification of the barriers to improving boys achievement (OFSTED, 2003). The quality of management and leadership indoors the schools plays a major part in developing thriving strategies. base on balls teachers who keep their students at the heart of the schools ethos and everything they do, find it easier to engage staff and parents. Strong leadership can be the driving deposit behind change, untested expectations and inspirational success.They should * Create a culture of achievement with a positive can do attitude. * Have high expectations and t he preparation of intensive support should be expected of all * Allocate a lot of time to being in the classroom with teachers and pupils * Make authoritative that diversity of pupils backgrounds and circumstances are celebrated. * Make authoritative that all children are encouraged to achieve their potential and unimaginative expectations are not made. * Make sure that books used, displays and worksheets avoid stereotypical images, sexist diction and represent our multicultural society.The curriculum and language support also plays a major part in tackling underachievement. The Guardian (2013) agrees that barriers to learning faced by white working class boys are mostly concerned with language and literacy Many of these young people have a limited vocabulary and grasp of standard English and have a limited higher order reading skills such as skimming, scanning, synthesis, and empathy. Pupils with low levels of literacy rarely read at home, and their reading in this area stall s when they get into their teens.Our school believes that the curriculum should be accessible to all children whatever their age, race, gender, ability or social background. The use of appropriate reading materials gives the teachers the ideal opportunity for tackling stereotypical views, as well as widens their knowledge and understanding of things that middle class pupils already know and understand. Considering the above it was interesting to find that Schools and Communities Research revaluation (2010) suggests, it is unlikely that changing textbooks or curriculum content will in itself lead to improved outcomes in reading or mathematics.It is believed that professional development and coaching in effective teaching strategies make much more of a difference. Continuing, extensive professional development to teachers is likely to improve academic attainment for poor pupils therefore teachers need extensive, engaging workshops to learn new strategies and then coaching to be able to successfully implement and maintain them in their classrooms. Behaviour management also plays a major part in training achievement of working class boys, and involves using successful strategy which requires a planned approach and subsequently dedication from all parties involved specially educators, pupils and parents. Ofsted reinforces this view by stating that behaviour is significantly better in settings which have a strong sense of community and work closely with parents and carers. In these settings learners feel safe and are confident that issues such as bullying are dealt with swiftly and fairly (Ofsted, 2005). Involvements of parents in the school life of their children, and their aspirations for them, have been also acknowledged as some of the most important factors associated with lower educational achievement.This appears to be particularly relevant to children from low-income families as parental aspirations and attitudes towards education vary significantly accordi ng to socio-economic status (Goodman and Gregg 2010). Young working class boys lack self believe and aspirations which results in having difficulties in understanding its importance and relevance. A lot of working class parents have had poor experience of education and believe that there is nothing to be gained from it as their children are likely to end up unemployed, or perhaps have achieved a lot in life through hard work despite having no formal qualifications.In both cases parents do not believe in education therefore pass that view and lack of aspirations onto their children (The Guardian, 2013). The head teacher of the local school reported that the white working class families were the hardest to engage within the life of the school and their childrens learning. School staff expressed frustration at the mismatch between the high aspirations of the school and low aspirations of the parents for their childrens learning, and therefore have to work hard on strategies to engage w hite parents with a view to genteelness achievement.School staff are aware that they have to draw parents in for positive reasons as a counter balance for the negative experiences that many had at school themselves. Younger amp Warrington (2005) suggested that a combination of a strong learning ethos in school and increased involvement of parents in their childrens education could raise aspirations and achievement. There are number of reasons why white working class pupils should be able to do well academically despite challenging socio-economic circumstances in the areas served by schools.The bear witness presented by the teachers from our local school mentioned earlier, enables the conclusion to be drawn that this school demonstrates the many ways in which they work to support pupils through a wide range of imaginative and inclusive strategies. Their success in raising the achievement of their pupils is a tribute to their vision, and to the very hard work that is necessitate to make it a reality. WORD COUNT 2028 References BBC News Channel. (2008). White working class boys failing. gettable http//news. bbc. co. uk/1/hi/education/7220683. stm.Last accessed twenty-eighth Feb 2013 Centre for Excellence and Outcomes in Children and Young Peoples go . (2011). Effective classroom strategies for closing the gap in educational achievement for children and young people living in poverty, including white working-class boys. ready(prenominal) http//www. c4eo. org. uk/themes/schools/classroomstrategies/files/classroom_strategies_research_review. pdf. Last accessed 3th March 2013. Daily Mail. (2012). White working-class boys are consigned to education scrapheap, Ofsted warns. Available http//www. dailymail. co. uk/news/article-2159616/The-anti-school-culture-condemns-white-boys-failure. tml. Last accessed twenty-eighth Feb 2013. Department for Education and Skills. (2004). quintuple Year Strategy for Children and Learning. Putting people at the heart of public ser vices. Availablehttps//www. education. gov. uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/DfES-5%20Year%20Plan. pdf. Last accessed 21st February 2013. Department for Education and Skills. (2005). procreation Boys Achievement. Available https//www. education. gov. uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/RR636. pdf. Last accessed 28th Feb 2013. Goodman, A. , Gregg, P. (2010). POORER CHILDRENS EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT HOW IMPORTANT argon ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOUR?.Available http//www. jrf. org. uk/publications/educational-attainment-poor-children. Last accessed 3th March 2013. Hammersley-Fletcher, L. , Lowe, M. and Pugh, J. (2006) The Teaching Assistants Guide, an essential textbook for foundation degree students. Oxton, Routledge. OFSTED. (2003). Boys achievement in secondary schools. Available http//www. ofsted. gov. uk/resources/boys-achievement-secondary-schools. Last accessed 28th February 2013. OFSTED. (2005) Managing challenging behaviour. Available http//www. ofsted. gov. uk/resources/managing-chal lenging-behaviour. Last accessed fifteenth February 2013. Swain, J. (2003).How young schoolboys become somebody the role of the body in the construction of masculinity. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24 299-314. Swain, J. (2004). The resources and strategies that 10-11-year-old boys use to construct masculinities in the school setting. British Educational Research Journal, 20 167-85. The Guardian. (2013). Working class boys schools must work with parents to raise their attainment. Available http//www. guardian. co. uk/teacher-network/teacher-blog/2013/jan/17/working-class-boys-raise-attainment. Last accessed 3th March 2013. The Telegraph. (2011). Why are poor white boys doing so badly at school?Its about culture, and weve got to change it. Available http//blogs. telegraph. co. uk/news/neilobrien1/100102225/why-are-poor-white-boys-doing-so-badly-at-school-its-about-culture-and-weve-got-to-change-it/. Last accessed 28th Feb 2013. Warrington, M. , Younger, M. (2006) Raising Boys Achievement in Primary Schools. Berkshire, McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing. Willis, P. (1977). Learning to sweat How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs. Aldershot Saxon House. Younger, M. , McLellan, R. , Warrington, M. (2005). Raising Boys Achievement in Secondary Schools. Birkshire McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing.